• Photo
stamford_fire_20111225203307_JPG

Firefighters spray water on the roof of a house where an early morning fire left five people dead Sunday, Dec. 25, 2011, in Stamford, Conn. Officials said the fire killed two adults and three children. (AP Photo/Tina Fineberg)
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Stamford fire rubble

Advertisement

Key findings in report on Stamford Christmas fire

Updated: Friday, 08 Jun 2012, 1:38 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 08 Jun 2012, 1:36 PM EDT

(AP) -- A look at some of the key findings in the report of State's Attorney David Cohen on the fatal Christmas Day fire in Stamford, Conn.:

____

SMOKE DETECTORS: Neither the survivors of the fire or any neighbors reported hearing any smoke detectors on the morning of the fire. Smoke detectors had been installed but were not connected to the electrical system of the house. Cohen said five or six battery-operated smoke detectors had been installed, but there was no consensus on how many alarms were present and whether they had been removed or disabled. "In this area there are very few undisputed facts," Cohen said.

____

CITY FAULTED: Cohen said his investigation was hampered by actions of Stamford city officials. The house was demolished before investigators could determine whether smoke detectors were present in the debris, and he said police and state prosecutors should be consulted before demolition is authorized in future cases. He said the local fire marshal should notify the state fire marshal's office before relinquishing the scene.

____

ASHES REMOVED: Ashes removed from the fireplace and left in a mudroom were identified as the cause of the fire. Michael Borcina, a friend of the home's owner, shoveled the ash into a paper bag around 3:30 a.m. and smoothed them with his hand. The owner, Madonna Badger, said this allayed any concerns she might have had about live embers.

____

CONSIDERATION OF CHARGES: Cohen declined to pursue criminal charges, saying there wasn't evidence to establish that Borcina or Badger were aware of and disregarded the risk of a live ember starting a fire. He said a manslaughter charge would have required evidence that they consciously disregarded such a risk, and it would stretch belief to think they would go to sleep in the house knowing of the danger.

  • Share Your Opinion.
  • More Stories - Stamford Fire
Survivor of Christmas fire wonders why she lived
Survivor of fire wonders why she lived

In the year since her three daughters and her parents died in a…

Dad sues ex's lover, city after fatal Conn. fire
Dad sues ex's lover, city after fire

The father of the three girls killed in a Christmas morning …

New lawsuits planned in fatal Conn. Christmas fire
New lawsuits planned in Stamford fire

The estates of two grandparents killed in a Christmas morning …

Mom: Ashes blamed in fatal Conn. blaze seemed safe
Mom: Ashes in fatal blaze seemed safe

A woman whose three daughters and parents died in a …

Survivor describes deadly Stamford Christmas fire
Survivor describes fatal Christmas fire

The woman whose three daughters and parents died in a Christmas…

Residents shocked no charges filed
Residents shocked no charges filed

Stamford residents are shocked that no criminal charges will be…

Attorney for father of fire victims slams city
No criminal charges in Christmas fire

Criminal charges won't be filed in a Christmas morning house…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement