Hartford (WTNH) - Sen. Chris Dodd continues to be at the vortex of the controversy
surrounding the AIG bonuses because of his conflicting answers to
questions about his amendment earlier this week. He was back in
Connecticut Friday to try and straighten things out.
There was a swarm of news media cameras and reporters around
Dodd today for a routine announcement at the Enfield Police
Department that normally would brought out two or three reporters
at most. Even CNN was there with a satellite truck to interview
Dodd, but they didn't want to talk about the grant to the Enfield
PD.
Dodd also paid a visit to a Connecticut Public Television
interview show where most of the questions were about the events of
this week. Dodd then sat down with News Channel 8.
Mark Davis: I think we all understand now that you didn't write
this part, the Treasury Department did, because they were afraid of
lawsuits, but why was it so difficult to get you to say that?
Dodd: It was my fault for not understanding the question. I
heard the word AIG bonuses in conjunction with the date at the time
we wrote the amendment, and even up until the end of last week, I
had no idea about any bonuses at AIG.
Davis: Why did Treasury Secretary Tom Geithner take so long to
say; 'Dodd didn't write this, we did, we wanted it?'
Dodd: Well, that's a question I've been asking myself over
the last three days too, Mark. You know, frankly, I would have
preferred they stood up at the moment and said; 'listen, we're the
ones who insisted upon this.' And I'm offended, in a way, that
people haven't stood up and taken responsibility for what they
requested.
Davis: Now the public sees the Congress has passed a law to
allow the bonuses and then they passed another law to take them
away, it's starting to look ridiculus.
Dodd: Well, it does, and, in fact, there's one provision. I
don't want to get too much in the details, but a provision that
remained in the amendment, Mark, that I want people to be aware of.
[It] says the Secretary has the right, if there are any bonuses
given, contrary to the purposes of TARP, or contrary to public
interest, that he has the right to reach back after those bonuses.
That language is still in my amendment, was not taken out at
all.
As far as the political damage this may have caused, Dodd says
he's more concerned about fixing the nation's ailing economy than
saving his job. Although he said again today that he does plan to
run for re-election next year.