red light cameras traffic light

Red light camera push losing steam?

Red light camera push losing steam?

Red light camera push losing steam?

Large Map
  • More CT Politics
Murphy defeats McMahon in Senate race
Murphy defeats McMahon

Democratic congressman Chris Murphy has defeated pro wrestling …

Obama beats Romney in Conn. for 7 electoral votes
Obama beats Romney in CT

President Barack Obama has won Connecticut's seven electoral …

Rep. Larson wins 8th term in Conn.'s 1st District
Rep. Larson wins 8th term

Democratic Congressman John Larson will return to Washington …

Conn. surgeons calling for medical spa regulations
Surgeons call for medical spa regs

Connecticut plastic surgeons are meeting at the state Capitol …

Conn. court blasts prosecutor, reverses conviction
Court blasts prosecutor

Connecticut's second-highest court blasted a state prosecutor …

Murphy urges bipartisan nuclear waste storage plan
Murphy urges nuclear waste storage plan

U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy is asking Senate leaders to solve the …

Malloy updates collision impact on train service
Malloy updates impact on train service

Governor Malloy gave an update on the impact to train service …

Advertisement

Red light camera push losing steam?

Updated: Wednesday, 02 May 2012, 7:23 PM EDT
Published : Wednesday, 02 May 2012, 5:46 PM EDT

HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) -- It appears the push to get red light cameras in Connecticut cities, is likely heading for the scrap heap.

In the name of public safety, the Mayors of New Haven, Hartford, and Bridgeport, all want cameras at intersections that catch people running red lights and send a ticket in the mail.

"They're spy cams, that's all they are," said Rep. Bob Godfrey, "they're a way for government to go after people...keeping track of their movements."

"I don't think people should have to go into court and have to defend themselves, they didn't do it, you know," said Rep. Zeke Zalaski, "everybody should be innocent until proven guilty, this is the opposite to me."

"There is no question, in my mind, this is about boosting municipal revenue without having to tax anyone," said Godfrey.

Those arguments against the red light cameras seem to be winning the day in the House. So the bill, despite being approved by all the appropriate committees, appears to be headed for a dead end.

Advocates who originally wanted the cameras set up in 19 cities and towns are rolling back the plan to just a handful for a trial run.

"Just an experiment, we want to have up to seven towns of different sizes and different communities that would allow this program to just be developed," said Rep. Roland Lemar, "see if it works, see if we can continue it."

Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney is also from New Haven and has been attempting to get the cameras for several years.

"We're requiring, under the bill, that a sign be posted before the intersection where the cameras are in use," said Looney, "so it's not a 'gotcha' effort, it's...it really is about public safety."

Further complicating the effort is the fact that the NAACP says the law would unfairly target minority drivers because they live in large numbers in the big cities that would first have the cameras.

If the advocates of the red light cameras can't get commitments from at least 76 lawmakers in the House, it will not even come up for a vote by next Wednesday.

  • Share Your Opinion.
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • The News in Photos

Photos: OKC suburbs ravaged by tornado

A monstrous tornado as much as a mile wide roared through the Oklahoma City suburbs on May 20, 2013, …

Advertisement